JRW / Blog / Guides

What a medical billing company costs.

Most billing companies charge a percentage of what they collect, usually between 5% and 8%. On a five-provider practice collecting $3 million that is $150,000 to $240,000 a year, before extras. The fee pays for real work. It also rewards some of that work more than the rest and, in some states, creates a legal problem.

The percentage, in dollars.

Billing companies quote 4% to 10% of collections. Most quotes to a small practice land between 5% and 8%; specialists who bill fewer, larger claims get 3% to 8%. These are the companies’ own ranges. We found no independent survey of them.

Five primary care providers collecting $600,000 each pay $180,000 a year at 6%. Add the things the percentage does not cover, patient statements, clearinghouse pass-through, software seats, a monthly minimum, and the calculator puts it at $184,800. That is about $7.90 a claim on 23,400 claims a year.

Two things about the percentage. It rises with revenue, whatever the work: a practice that adds a provider or renegotiates a contract pays more for the same claims. And the base matters. A fee on gross charges is a fee on a number two or three times larger than net collections. Read which one your contract says.

What it buys.

A billing company takes the charge from your EHR, checks the codes, scrubs the claim against payer edits, submits it through a clearinghouse, posts the payment when it arrives, works the denials, sends patient statements and follows up on what is unpaid. Good ones report on all of it monthly. Many also credential providers with payers, for a separate fee.

Usually excluded: claims with dates of service before the contract began, old accounts receivable, coding itself, and appeals past the first level. Each is either billed extra or left undone, so ask before you sign.

The work takes real time. CAQH measured a manual claim status call at 25 minutes, the longest administrative task it tracks. A biller who handles 6,700 claims a year, the one published benchmark, is doing a real job. The question is the price and what it rewards.

What the model rewards.

A company paid on collections wants collections. That aligns with you on the big claims. It aligns less on the small ones, because the labor is theirs and the fee on a $90 visit is five dollars. A denial on that visit costs more to fight than it earns, so the company lets it wait and then writes it off. Premier found 54.3% of denied claims were eventually paid, but only after someone wrote an appeal for each. In MGMA’s January 2026 poll, 48% of practice leaders named denials and appeals as their biggest source of lost revenue.

Underpayments are the same story. Checking a remittance against the contract line by line is slow, and the recovery on any one claim is small. Vendors claim payers underpay by 7% to 11%; we could not find the study, and the real number for your practice is whatever a line-by-line check finds. At one five-provider practice it was $68,000 in a year.

A percentage fee pays for collections, and the company staffs to match. If you want denials worked and remittances audited, the contract has to say so and the reporting has to show it.

The legal wrinkle.

Medicare’s rules let a billing agent receive payment on a provider’s behalf only if the agent’s pay is not related in any way to the amounts billed or collected. That is why percentage billers have payments sent to the practice. State law goes further. In 2008 the Illinois Appellate Court voided a billing contract at 4.5% of reimbursements as fee-splitting. Illinois has since changed the law: a percentage fee for billing and collection is allowed if the practice controls what is charged and collected and the money goes straight to the practice. In 2017 New York’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit sought recoupment, plus 9% interest, from providers who paid billers a percentage of Medicaid collections, and the state medical society told members to pay billers by time or a flat fee.

Each state has its own rule. Virginia and Tennessee make percentage fee-splitting a misdemeanor; California allows most percentage agreements at fair market value. Most billing companies operate on percentages anyway. If you are in New York, or bill Medicaid anywhere, ask a healthcare lawyer what your contract exposes you to. This is not legal advice.

In-house can cost more.

Run the same five providers in-house. 23,400 claims at 6,700 per biller is three and a half billers. At the federal median wage of $23.32 plus 30% for benefits and overhead, that is about $220,000 a year, plus $18,000 in software and clearinghouse fees. That is more than the billing company charges.

Vendors say in-house billing costs 13.7% of collections and attribute it to MGMA. We could not find that figure in anything MGMA has published, and the guides that quote it name no report. Ignore the number. The direction is still right for a small practice: billing staff are a fixed cost, they turn over, and when one leaves the claims stop.

The 6,700 is also from 2008. The practice in our case ran 11,700 claims per biller with two people. One claim in six came back, and the billers had no time to check the payments. Without help, an in-house desk either overstaffs or leaves denials unworked.

What changes with an agent.

Most billing hours are repetitive: checking eligibility, scrubbing a claim against rules that can be written down, sending it, reading the acknowledgement, checking status, posting the remittance, sorting denials by reason. An agent inside your EHR and clearinghouse does those on each claim, the same way each time. A person reviews what it finds, approves corrections, signs appeals and talks to patients.

At the five-provider practice, first-pass acceptance went from 84% to 96%, days in A/R from 46 to 31, and the two billers got 35 hours a week back. The case. The calculator prices the in-house desk with an agent against the percentage fee for your own numbers, and labels the result before our fee. Our fee is a fixed price per automation.

Sources.

  1. Medical billing cost guide: percentage of collections, per-claim and hidden fees. GetPracticeHelp and other vendor guides, 2026. Vendor price guides put outsourced billing at 4% to 10% of collections, with most small-practice quotes between 5% and 8%; per-claim pricing at $4 to $10; flat plans at $200 to $1,000 per provider per month. Specialists are often quoted lower percentages, 3% to 8%, because they bill fewer, larger claims. Some contracts charge on gross charges rather than net collections. Setup, clearinghouse, statement, resubmission and minimum fees come on top. No independent survey of fees exists; these are the companies' own ranges. A claim that in-house billing costs 13.7% of collections, attributed to MGMA, circulates in the same guides with no report named; we could not find it in any MGMA publication. Source
  2. Private payers retain profits by refusing or delaying legitimate medical claims. Premier Inc., 2024. Survey of 516 hospitals in 36 states on 2022 claims, published March 2024: nearly 15% of claims to private payers denied on first submission; 54.3% of those eventually paid, after appeals; $43.84 in administrative cost per claim to fight a denial; about $19.7 billion a year spent adjudicating denials. Hospitals, not physician practices. Source
  3. Days in A/R holds steady for most practices, but payer pressure persists. MGMA Stat, 2026. Poll of 203 medical group leaders, July 2026: days in A/R the same as a year ago for 43%, higher for 32%, lower for 22%. MGMA benchmarking puts first-submission denials at 7% to 8% over the past four years and says practices can get below 5% with targeted fixes. In a January 2026 poll, 48% named denials and appeals as their largest source of revenue leakage. Source
  4. Top KPIs physician practices should be monitoring. MGMA with Conifer Health Solutions, 2023. April 2023 benchmark paper: net collection rate minimum 95%, optimal 97% to 99% (citing the AAFP); clean claims rate 98%; days in A/R 30 to 40, under 30 achievable; A/R over 90 days under 10%; industry average denial rate 5% to 10%; bad debt under 5%. Targets assembled from several published sources, not one survey. Source
  5. 2024 CAQH Index, claims transactions. CAQH, 2024. Calendar-2023 data from plans and providers. Provider cost and time per transaction, manual versus fully electronic: claim submission $6.33 versus $3.05, 12 minutes versus 5; claim status inquiry $13.80 versus $3.64, 25 minutes versus 7, the longest manual task CAQH measured; remittance advice $5.67 versus $2.95, 9 minutes versus 5; eligibility verification $8.57 versus $4.50 partial, 16 minutes versus 4. Labor only, excluding system costs and follow-up. Source
  6. Biller benchmarks. Physicians Practice, 2008. An industry median of 6,700 claims processed per biller per year, no source named. Also, citing MGMA at the time: a median of 0.61 staff per full-time provider in patient accounting, general accounting and managed-care administration, costing multispecialty practices 2.7% of net medical revenue. Old, and the only claims-per-biller figure in print; the practice in our case ran 11,700 per biller and was behind on denials. Source
  7. Financial clerks, billing and posting clerks, median pay. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2025. Median pay for billing and posting clerks $48,500 a year, May 2025; $23.32 an hour at 2,080 hours. 418,000 jobs, projected flat to 2035. All industries, not medical billing alone. Before benefits and overhead. Source
  8. 42 CFR 424.73, prohibition of assignment of claims by providers. Code of Federal Regulations, via Cornell LII, 2026. Medicare may pay a billing agent on the provider's behalf only if the agent's compensation is not related in any way to the dollar amounts billed or collected and not dependent on actual collection, among other conditions. The rule governs payment made to the agent; it is why percentage billers must have payments go to the practice. Source
  9. Illinois law prohibits percentage-based compensation between physician groups and billing companies. Foley & Lardner, 2008. Center for Athletic Medicine v. Independent Medical Billers of Illinois, Illinois Appellate Court, May 2008: a billing contract at 4.5% of reimbursements was void under the state's fee-splitting ban, whatever the purpose. The court suggested a flat fee tied to volume and complexity would be valid. Illinois has since amended the statute; see 225 ILCS 60/22.2(d). Source
  10. Medical Practice Act, prohibition against fee splitting, 225 ILCS 60/22.2. Illinois General Assembly, 2026. Subsection (d) allows a fair market value fee to a billing or collection company, including a percentage of fees billed or collected, provided the licensee at all times controls the fees charged and collected and all charges collected are paid directly to the licensee or the practice, or into an account in its name. Source
  11. New York Medical Society warns providers to avoid percentage-based fees. Mintz, 2017. New York's Medicaid Fraud Control Unit sent recoupment letters to providers whose billing companies were paid a percentage of Medicaid collections, seeking the overpayment plus 9% interest, under 18 NYCRR 360-7.5(c), which requires a billing agent's pay to be unrelated to the amounts billed and collected. The Medical Society of the State of New York warned members in February 2017 to pay billers by time or a flat fee. Source
  12. Changing laws on third-party billing and the percentage-based model. Liles Parker, 2022. A health-law firm's review: every state is different. New York is the most restrictive, California allows most percentage-based agreements at fair market value, and Virginia and Tennessee make percentage fee-splitting a misdemeanor. Source
  13. Underpayment rates circulated by vendors. Vendor blogs citing MGMA and Change Healthcare, 2025. Vendors say payers underpay physician groups by 7% to 11% of net revenue and attribute it to MGMA; we could not locate the MGMA study. A Change Healthcare figure of 5% to 15% of claims underpaid and an MGMA 2019 finding that 69% of organizations reported commercial underpayments circulate the same way, second-hand. The calculator default is 0.5% of collections, far below these. Source
  14. Claims and payments at an internal medicine practice. JRW case study, 2026. Five providers, two locations, about 450 claims a week, two billers. After an agent began scrubbing claims against payer rules, working denials and checking every payment against the contract: first-pass acceptance 84% to 96%, days in A/R 46 to 31, $68k in underpayments found in the first year, 35 hours a week of billing staff time back. One engagement. Source

Questions.

What is a fair percentage?
For a primary care practice with clean claims, the low end of the quoted range, 4% to 6% of net collections, with statements and clearinghouse included. Specialists should see less. Anything on gross charges needs converting before you compare it.
Should we negotiate rather than leave?
Often, yes. Ask for the fee on net collections, a denial report by reason every month, appeals through the second level included, and a 60-day exit with your data returned. If you get all four, the percentage matters less.
Does an agent replace the billers?
It takes over most of their hours and leaves the judgment calls with them. The practices we work with keep a biller or a billing manager and stop hiring the third one.

See what your billing invoice comes to per claim.

Bring your last billing invoice and your claims a week, and we’ll run the comparison with you. Fixed price per automation; if the first one misses the scope we agreed, you don’t pay.

Book a call (opens in a new tab)

Related: Medical billing cost calculator · Claim denial statistics · How to replace your billing company · Claims and payments case study · Claims and payments automation