JRW / Blog / Guides

Speed to lead for law firms.

In 2025, a quarter of law firms answered a web form within five minutes. A quarter had not answered a week later. The median was 13 minutes. In 2021 it was 25, and 40% did not answer. Firms are getting faster, so the ones that are not fall further behind each year.

The studies.

Hennessey Digital, a law firm marketing agency, has submitted a web form under an alias to more than a thousand law firms every year since 2021 and timed the first personal reply. In 2025: 1,333 firms, 25% within five minutes, 33% within ten, 56% within an hour, a median of 13 minutes, and 26% with no reply in seven days. In 2021 the median was 25 minutes and 40% never replied.

The older, broader study is Oldroyd, McElheran and Elkington in Harvard Business Review, 2011: a test lead sent to 2,241 US companies of all kinds. 37% responded within an hour, 24% took more than a day, 23% never responded, and the average among those who did was 42 hours.

Then the number everyone quotes: a lead contacted within five minutes is 21 times more likely to qualify than one contacted at 30. That comes from a 2007 analysis of one vendor’s call data at six companies, presented at a conference and often miscredited to MIT. The direction is likely right. Don’t build a business case on the multiple.

On the phone side, Clio’s secret shoppers found about 40% of firms answered live, and a 1,200-call audit of small and mid-sized firms found 34.8% unanswered in business hours.

Why minutes matter.

A person with a legal problem often contacts more than one firm. The first firm to reply gets the conversation; the second gets “I’ve already spoken to someone.” The evidence shows no five-minute threshold. It does show, study after study, that faster is better and that a quarter of firms do not reply within a week.

What the first response should do.

A fast reply with nothing in it reads to the prospect as an auto-reply. The first response should:

  1. Say who you are and that a person will follow up, and when.
  2. Ask the matter type and the one or two facts that decide whether the firm takes it: jurisdiction, date, the other party’s name for a conflict check.
  3. Offer a consultation time, from the real calendar.
  4. Leave out legal advice and fees.

An intake agent connected to the firm’s case management system does all four within a minute of the form landing, at 2am as at 2pm, and opens the intake record. The lawyer’s first touch is then a scheduled call with the facts already in front of them. How our intake agent answers for law firms.

Forms, calls, chat.

The form is the easy one: it arrives as text and you can answer it as text. Calls are where firms lose the most, because 60% are not answered live and a prospective client with a fresh problem often does not leave a voicemail. The missed-call calculator for law firms puts a number on it. Chat widgets are the same problem as forms with a shorter fuse: a prospect waiting on a chat gives you about a minute.

Two things to check first.

Confidentiality. The ABA’s Formal Opinion 512 says Rules 1.6 and 1.18 cover information from prospective clients, so where the form data and the call content go, who sees it, and whether any of it trains a model are questions for any intake vendor. Recording. Eleven states require every party’s consent to record a call; if calls are recorded, decide how consent is captured before anything goes live.

What to measure.

  • Median time to first personal response, by channel and by hour of day. Look at the after-hours number first.
  • Share of leads answered within five minutes, and share never answered.
  • Share of leads that booked a consultation, and the no-show rate on those.
  • Run Hennessey’s test on yourself: fill in your own form at 7pm on a Tuesday and time it.

Sources.

  1. 2025 Lead Form Response Time Study. Hennessey Digital, 2025. Web forms submitted under an alias to 1,333 US law firms, personal injury, criminal defense and others, first quarter of 2025, weekday mornings: 25% responded within 5 minutes, 33% within 10, 56% within an hour; median 13 minutes; 26% never responded within seven days. In 2021: 13% within 5 minutes, 40% never, median 25 minutes. Run by a law firm marketing agency. Source
  2. The short life of online sales leads. Oldroyd, McElheran and Elkington, Harvard Business Review, 2011. A test lead sent to 2,241 US companies: 37% responded within an hour, 16% within a day, 24% took longer than a day, 23% never responded. Average response among those who did, 42 hours. All industries, 2011. Source
  3. Lead Response Management study. Oldroyd for InsideSales.com, 2007. The source of the claim that contacting a lead within five minutes makes it 21 times more likely to qualify than at 30 minutes. Vendor platform data, six companies, presented at a 2007 conference and widely miscredited to MIT. Directional at best. Source
  4. Legal Trends Report, secret-shopper study. Clio, via the American Bar Association, 2024. 500 US firms phoned as prospective clients: about 40% answered live, down from 56% in 2019; about 52% made contact once callbacks are counted. Source
  5. 1,200 calls to small and mid-sized law firms. Law Leaders / LegalNavigator, 2025. Calls placed 10am to 4pm on business days over four weeks: 34.8% unanswered. Run by a vendor of AI intake, with no per-call data published. Source
  6. Formal Opinion 512, generative AI tools. American Bar Association, Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, 2024. The ABA's first ethics opinion on lawyers' use of generative AI, July 2024: competence (Rule 1.1), confidentiality (Rule 1.6), communication (Rule 1.4), reasonable fees (Rule 1.5) and supervision (Rules 5.1 and 5.3) apply. Informed consent is required before confidential information goes into a self-learning tool whose later users could see it; boilerplate in an engagement letter is not informed consent. Advisory; state bars issue their own guidance. Source
  7. Phone call recording laws by state. Rev and other vendor summaries, 2025. Eleven states are usually listed as requiring every party's consent to record a call: California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington, with Connecticut and Michigan treated as special cases; the rest need one party's. Vendor summaries agree on the core list; check the statute and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press guide for your state. Source

Questions.

Is five minutes the target?
It is a good one, because a quarter of your competitors already hit it. The evidence says faster is better and names no threshold. Under a minute is easy for a form once an agent answers it, so aim there.
Should the first reply come from a lawyer?
No. It should come from whoever can answer in a minute, say when the lawyer will call, and ask the screening questions. The lawyer’s time goes into the consultation, with the facts already gathered.
Does a fast reply change which cases we get?
It changes which conversations you get. With screening questions in the first reply, the agent filters out the cases you do not take before they reach the lawyer’s calendar.

Want the form answered in a minute?

Tell us your case management system and where your leads land, and we’ll draft the first reply an intake agent would send. Fixed price per automation. If the first one misses the scope we agreed, you don’t pay.

Book a call (opens in a new tab)

Related: AI intake for law firms · Missed calls, law firm · AI vs live answering service for a law firm